theauspolchronicles:

So who is Peter Dutton?

He’s a former police officer turned Liberal politician from Queensland representing the electorate of Dickson since 2001. This is how he’s voted on a few issues to help you understand what he’s like (a more comprehensive list can be found on TheyVoteForYou.org)

  • Decreasing availability to welfare payments (and then drug
    testing those who are on them, a discriminatory practice) as well as then
    putting people on welfare on restricted debit cards to control what they can
    and can’t buy
  • He’s voted for deregulating university fees (which would give
    students massive amounts of debt to pay off over their life time)
  • He has voted for decreasing funding to the ABC and SBS 
  • He was for getting rid of penalty rates (which negatively
    affects low income earners who relied on that extra money)
  • He voted to increase his own paycheck and parliamentary
    entitlements
  • Wants to reduce corporate tax rates
  • Strengthening gun control laws (everyone has at least one
    agreeable thing and we found it)
  • He’s voted against protections for refugees (duh, he hates them)
  • Voted against increasing Aboriginal land rights (and boycotted
    Rudd’s apology to the Stolen Generation back in 2008, though has since said he
    regrets that)
  • Voted against protecting the Great Barrier Reef (which is dying
    from climate change – something the Liberal party refuses to act on, even
    removing the emissions reduction target from the National Energy Guarantee
    legislation)
  • While he’s ignoring climate change he’s laughing at those who
    are affected by it and was caught making a joke about rising sea levels in the pacific islands
  • He’s voted against increasing investment into renewable energy
  • He voted against a Royal Commission into Violence and Abuse
    against People With Disabilities
  • He voted No in the same sex marriage plebiscite (so he’s
    homophobic)
  • Voted against increasing media diversity in Australia (which
    suits him just fine as the Murdoch media empire is pro-Liberal and will push to
    get him in so he can protect them from paying tax as he’s for corporate tax
    cuts)

He’s most famous for in the past few
years taking over dealing with refugees from former Minister of Immigration Scott Morrison. Here’s just a few details about that:

He’s a racist vile and cruel man who punishes the poor and would rather see children suffer than to let a few refugees into this country.

And he wants to lead this country.

cakeandrevolution:

thexdarkenedxlight:

vangoghstss:

calumthonas:

:/

This is actually v important and needs to be reblogged

Gonna just share this:

My European Studies professor decided a few weeks ago to take a Friday and instead of following the syllabus, he spent the entire hour and a half comparing Hitler’s actions from a European perspective to that of what Trump is doing in America. He never repeated a single point, and even used video and photos like this to show the comparison.

To make things better, he had us do an in class assignment for participation points. He first played a clip on youtube of one of Hilter’s speeches, subtitled and 3 minutes long. He then played a clip of one of Trump’s rallies. Our assignment? Copy down every single sentence that matched in translation down on a sheet of paper or a word document that wasn’t repeated. The person with the closest amount to what my professor found got a candy bar.

My professor found, in just three minutes of a speech, that Trump matched 65 different phrases/sentences to that of Hitler’s translation. 

65 nearly identical phrases used in his speeches. Take a moment to think about that.

Like, according to Trump’s first wife Ivana he kept a book of Hitler’s speeches in his nightstand and would read it periodically… so the overlap is not at all surprising given his obsession with Hitler’s propaganda.

Because abortions aren’t the only way the patriarchy wants to control your junk

lisafer:

purpleterpsichore:

ladyyatexel:

capncrystal:

kaijutegu:

krismichelle429:

traveldustedshoes:

OBGYN: Yeah, you are exhibiting all the signs of Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. I’m so sorry.

Me: Huh? Oh, yeah. Insulin resistance, impossible weight loss, pre-disposition to type II diabetes, painful AF periods. Likelihood of bleed outs. Crap. That blows.

OBGYN: Yeah, well that too.

Me: *blinks* What?

OBGYN: Well, PCOS makes it very difficult for a woman to conceive and carry.

Me: BWHAHAHAHA. Yeah. No. No babies. Ever. Never wanted them. At all. Maternal instinct is not strong with this one. Only upside today.

OBGYN: Well then. Not exactly problem solved, but we’ll run with it.

Me: So about the MIND-SEARING PAIN and occasional HEAVY AF BLEEDING. When can we deal with that.

OBGYN: Not until you are 35.

Me: Dah fuq?

OBGYN: Not my rules. Hospitalization won’t even consider any treatment unless it’s life or death until you’re 35.

Me: Why?

OBGYN: Because you might want to have a baby.

Me: I’m 31. I didn’t want kids when I was 11, I didn’t want them at 21, and I sure as shit don’t want them now. Can’t I just sign a form that says “I don’t ever want a baby take it out, take it out now”?

OBGYN: Nope.

Me: Why?

OBGYN: Government rules. No removal of baby making parts before 35 unless your life is in immediate jeopardy.

TL;DR: The government knows better about your baby making parts than you do.

This is just evil. They are literally refusing to treat a potentially life-threatening condition, not just without the patient’s consent but despite the patient’s protest. Evil.

According to the National Women’s Health Network, there’s no legal age restriction- “Technically, any woman of legal age can consent to the procedure, but it should be medically justified. It’s incredibly unlikely that a doctor will perform a hysterectomy on women ages 18-35 unless it is absolutely necessary for their well-being and no other options will suffice.” Of course, this is in the US. Other countries may have different rules. 

If you’re in the US and your OBGYN says “government says no,” look for a new one because they lied to you. If your OBGYN says that “hospital says no,” look for a new one because this one doesn’t respect your bodily autonomy. It is true that most surgeons don’t like to perform hysterectomies until you’re in your late 30s at the earliest, but a respectful surgeon will listen to their patient and not just write them off. Sexism in hospitals is alive and well– and it’s not just anecdotal evidence. There’s been a history of looking at it academically/professionally since the 70s (look into Mary Halas as a good place to start if you’re curious), and it crops up all the time in articles in the Journal of Women’s Health and Women’s Health Issues, and the International Journal of Women’s Health all of which are peer-reviewed, well-respected medical journals. It’s absolutely a real thing. 

Anyways, I guess what I’m getting at is this: here’s a list of doctors (mostly US-centric) who perform different sterilization surgeries without giving their patients trouble. While even a surgeon on this list might caution anyone under 35 away from a hysterectomy, at the end of the day it’s your body and your pain. (And some of the docs here have been known to perform hysterectomies on people in their 20s with no fuss.) While this list won’t be practical for everyone- after all, medical treatment is ridiculously expensive in this country, it might help someone. 

Holy shit fam
Holy S H I T

SIGN ME THE FUCK UP I’VE BEEN TOLD THIS IS NOT ALLOWED FOR YEARS

Oh god

QUICK REMINDER THAT I HAD A HYSTERECTOMY A FEW DAYS AFTER MY 26TH BIRTHDAY B/C I HAD CANCER AND I DID EXACTLY THIS. I HAD A DOCTOR WHO DIDN’T WANT TO DO IT AND THEN I WENT TO A NEW DOCTOR AND AFTERWARDS SHE MORE OR LESS SAID MY LIFE WOULD HAVE BEEN IN DANGER HAD I NOT DONE IT.

Sometimes it’s not the doctor, it’s the hospital.  For example, my OBGYN worked at a Catholic hospital, so they couldn’t perform any type of sterilization onsite unless it was an emergency situation.  

So if your doc feeds you this BS line about not being allowed to, ASK IF IT’S THE HOSPITAL POLICY.  If it is, ask if they are able to perform the procedure elsewhere. If they are not, ASK FOR A REFERRAL.

I was 28 years old when my OBGYN explained that he wasn’t allowed to perform a sterilization procedure onsite, and then he proceeded to tell me what a crock of shit it was and referred me to someone else who was able to. And even though I was under 30, his referral listed me as “an ideal candidate” for the procedure.  

If they pass off this line and insist when you know otherwise, FIND A NEW DOCTOR.