darkflamedmerkitten:

manosukenaitou:

reznorsbrat:

aaizawaa:

lesbiananti:

aaizawaa:

aaizawaa:

bye i hate the sexualization of underage japanese girls so much i hate it with every fiber of my being it gave so many people a shitty excuse to treat me badly in the past like anyone who likes ‘‘‘‘‘lo/licon’’’’ can go die

also this is 100% okay to reblog

to the people in the notes: the age of consent in japan is not actually 13 you nasty fucks did you like even read more than one sentence on wikipedia before spreading misinformation about an entire country jesus y’all are shit stains to the core

you. i like you.

also who gives a fuck about age of consent? lmao do y’all really need a law to know it’s wrong to fuck kids?

Also can those nasty pedophiles stop using the concept of “age of consent” wrong? Age of Consent does not mean you can fuck a child if they are above the age of consent. It means kids from that age can manifest consent when having sex WITH KIDS AROUND THE SAME AGE. 

Like, for example, if the age of consent is 13, it means kids who are 13-14-15 can have sex without it being considered a crime; but a kid who is 12 CANNOT manifest that consent and this another (older or younger) kid making sexual advances on them would be considered cocsa.

Adults can only legally have sex with kids if, for example, the adult is still a teen, aka if the adult just turned 18 and they’re having sex with a 17 yo. That’s widely considered admissible and it’s an exception to the rule.

So, no, you 20-something and older creeps fetishizing 13-14-15 yo girls (real or fictional) are still pedophiles, and you’re trying to use a legal argument that you:

1. do not know about because you just read a fucking wikipedia article and did not take years of classes about criminal law

2. twist for it to fit and excuse your awful behavior

Source: I’m a fucking lawyer

Reblog this adittion bc honestly pedophiles are INDEED pedophiles no matter what argument they use and you better listen to a fucking lawyer when they are talking about law

“Source: I’m a fucking lawyer“ is my favorite part

jaxxgarcia:

honestly i never want to hear again about how bisexuals don’t go through any type of struggle cause i had a conversation with a dude who has a boyfriend but my bi-fi went off with him and when i asked him if he was bi or gay the damn STRUGGLE on his face to give me an answer. he didn’t say anything for a bit and then shyly said “bisexuality doesn’t exist” and when i told him it did and explained about my bisexuality and about biphobia he //cried//. We were in the middle of a bar and this grown man was in full on tears in shock yet grateful biphobia was even a thing; going on about how he was always laughed at when he explained how he was attracted to women and men and how he was ostracized from his gay friends for not being gay enough so he denies a very real part of him to feel accepted and if that’s not fucked i don’t know what is. BISEXUALS ARE LGBT. PERIOD. FIGHT ME.

bakrua:

bakrua:

if you are 13 and there is a 17/18 year old showing interest in you: please run away and never look back. i understand that you feel special; that older person will tell you how mature you are and make you feel special. but please. run away from that person. stay away from them. they do not love you. an 18 year old should not have ANY interest in a 13 year old. please. please be safe. please do not let them manipulate you. they are dangerous. stay away from them

please reblog this post. please spread this message. please protect 13 year olds who can so easily be hurt.

revscarecrow:

Quick heads up to other partnered Youtube creators and anyone who follows my content.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/meganhills1/2018/06/04/youtube-anti-lgbt-ads/#701ae1fe4f73

TDLR: It appears that youtube is running anti-LGBT+ videos as ads before LGBT+ content. One of the people doing this claims it was unintentional but it doesn’t make him less of an asshole. Basically they tagged it as LGBT+ because they are old and dumb. The tagging system is suppose to be used for advertisers to target specific types of videos IE you watch gaming content so here is an ad for a PS4. But it can be abused apparently. So now what?

You don’t have to demonotize your entire channel if you want to stop these ads.

Youtube is really shit at giving partners info so I thought I’d help you out with a image. If you want to block specific ads on your content (as in they will not run on your content and you will not make money from hate speech) then log into your adsense account

follow these steps.

1. Click “allow & block ads”

2. Click “content host”

3. Click “All my sites”

4. Put the names of any of the associated websites

5. click the block URLs button and you are done in 24 hours the ads will stop appearing on your channel.

In step 4 you might notice that you will need the specific ad urls which Youtube won’t give you so you are gonna have to rely on going and finding them yourself. Remember that it is against youtube adsense policy to specifically load ads on your own videos so you are gonna have to look at other channels (or just use the 3 I blocked in the image).

This is the part where I need to apologize. If you have ever seen that kinda shit before one of my videos I am very sorry. It is not my intent or my aim to make money from hate speech. As far as I can tell I don’t think my channel ran any of these since my content is gaming and art related (so the ads are all lessons on how to learn to draw or up coming games) but I’m taking this precaution on the off chance that I am wrong. If however you do see an ad for this kind of bullshit run on one of my videos please let me know in a DM and I will add it to my list. Assuming Youtube works as intended (which is assuming a lot really) it will not show again.

If you are not a creator and want to help:

1. please link this to creators that you watch so it doesn’t show up on their stuff (this apparently is more important for LGBT+ creators to do for the above given reasons)

2. Let me know if you see these kinds of ads on my videos or anyone else’s so I can black list the ads. A screen shot of the ad itself is super helpful in finding the source without clicking the links. Send screenshots like that via the submission feature here on tumblr.

3. Tell Youtube that you aren’t ok with this kind of behavior directly. Message @teamyoutube or @youtube on twitter and be as calm and professional as you can be while telling them to stop being such dickheads. Youtube generally only reacts to major public outcry or if the advertisers get scared.

sleepylittledomme:

wolf-n-bones:

darkskin-papi:

jehovahhthickness:

jessnesquik:

jehovahhthickness:

Stop dating abusive women 2018

Hardly any women are gonna reblog this tbh 🙃

A lot of women behave like this and think this ain’t abuse

But let a nigga slap them, damage their clothes and pour a drink on them, all hell will break loose.

EVERYONE CAN BE A VICTIM OF DOMESTIC ABUSE!

SPREAD THIS SHIT ASAP BECAUSE THIS AINT RT! No man should have to prove his worth to girl who ain’t shit like this one!

This is inexcusable, regardless of gender. Look at his face. He didn’t expect that to happen. He SHOULDN’T expect that to happen. I hope he got out of that relationship. Beauty fades, a good personality is forever.

😦 Ladies, don’t act like this. This is most definitely abuse. This is never okay.

miss-helen-choi:

lokilover9:

way-2-haught:

bogleech:

paladin-of-voretron:

stenbroughbilliam:

iholtzmann:

cumkittenhowell:

closet-keys:

amazighprincex:

clarknokent:

juleswatsvn:

juleswatsvn:

If you call pedophilia a kink please unfollow me and never talk to me again

Isn’t it disgusting that 23 people just unfollowed me

Unfollow me too

this goes double if you call paedophilia a disability. unfollow me twice

and if you call pedophilia an “orientation” or in any way compare it to being LGBP+ you can unfollow, delete your blog, and set yourself on fire. 

I just lost 50 followers.. bye

clearing out the trash

GO ON AND S M A S H THAT UNFOLLOW BUTTON

BUHBYE U McNASTIES

I’ve seen this circulating forever and genuinely thought “no way do I have any of them following me” until this week when it turned out I had all these fuckin “MAP” (pedophile) followers sad to find out I’m an “anti” (normal person)

Please leave and also please get guinea worm.

Reblogging again in the hopes of getting rid off the trash on my dash

All of the above excuses? Yeah, push the button.

Bye you pieces of shit 🙂

feministism:

mavis-has-large-gay:

feministism:

mavis-has-large-gay:

he supported abortion and illegal immigration AND gun control until he suddenly ran for president and wanted to appeal to rational thinking people which is why he pretends to be a right winged smart person because hes a liberal in disguise tbh so ye fuck him

actually it’s because the right wing offers him more money [because they are more careless with their money/have to reinforce their ideas somehow: the NRA for example] and because he can get support by shock value, but go off, support a racist/sexist/homophobe/transphobe. saying that people who support and adore trump are rational though is embarassing and sad for multiple reasons, but mostly because you’re implying that racists/sexists/homophobes/transphobes are okay and fair in their discrimination

trump isnt-

and im literally-

GAHHHH-

AND HE ISNT EVEN HOMOPHOBIC!!! HES THE FIRST FUCKING PRESIDENT TO SUPPORT GAY MARRIAGE GOING INTO OFFICE ALTHOUGH HE DOESNT CONDONE IT FOR RELIGIOUS REASONS HE STILL PUTS IT ASIDE FOR PEOPLE TO BE ABLE TO MARRY WHO THEY WANT BUT

AND HIS POLICIES ON IMMIGRATION ARENT RACIALLY MOTIVATED ITS FOR ECONOMIC REASONS

AND HE SUPPORTS TRANS

ok the sexism i can kinda see in him but still

but yeah sure im a gay guy who supports homophobia because i support free thinking and religious freedom

homophobia/transphobia:

racism:

you don’t even need articles about his sexism and sexual harassment because he’s been 100% open and bragging about it (but for example, “grab her by the pussy” and Stormy)

you can like Trump, but saying he isn’t racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic is blatantly foolish and willingly turning a blind eye

(also, I’m pretty sure Obama supported the LGBT community during his presidency. He might not have been the first president ever to do it, but he certainly did it before–and better than–Trump. here’s what he did.)

ANYWAY. SIDENOTE but not really…where did you or I say anything regarding free thinking and religious freedom? you previously said “rational thinking” in reference to Trump supporters–not FREE. there is a fine difference between rational thinking and free thinking. trump supporters can think freely, but just because it’s independent thought doesn’t mean it’s rational.

that still doesn’t explain where the religious freedom bit came from though, as it wasn’t mentioned in your first comment. if you’re implying I’m against either, you probably a) don’t have a proper understanding of what “free thinking” (again, free thinking is not equivalent to rational thinking) or “religious freedom” is, or b) you don’t know my beliefs and haven’t cared to ask because you’d rather attack me in your ignorance. (additionally, if you’re going to support free thought, support it in everyone rather than just in ways in benefits you and your side. that prevents it from looking hypocritical.)

p.s. supporting free thought and religious freedom doesn’t mean you’re homophobic?? it’s the fact that you’re supporting a person–more importantly, defending a person–who is homophobic that, in turn, means you support homophobia in some form.

How Doctors Take Women’s Pain Less Seriously

lastoneout:

geekandmisandry:

lasciviousgrace:

pastrygeckos:

journalsarepointless:

welcome-to-fandomonium-blog:

bando–grand-scamyon:

phoenixfire-thewizardgoddess:

Early on a Wednesday morning, I heard an anguished cry—then silence.

I rushed into the bedroom and watched my wife, Rachel, stumble from the bathroom, doubled over, hugging herself in pain.

“Something’s wrong,” she gasped.

This scared me. Rachel’s not the type to sound the alarm over every pinch or twinge. She cut her finger badly once, when we lived in Iowa City, and joked all the way to Mercy Hospital as the rag wrapped around the wound reddened with her blood. Once, hobbled by a training injury in the days before a marathon, she limped across the finish line anyway.

So when I saw Rachel collapse on our bed, her hands grasping and ungrasping like an infant’s, I called the ambulance. I gave the dispatcher our address, then helped my wife to the bathroom to vomit.

I don’t know how long it took for the ambulance to reach us that Wednesday morning. Pain and panic have a way of distorting time, ballooning it, then compressing it again. But when we heard the sirens wailing somewhere far away, my whole body flooded with relief.

I didn’t know our wait was just beginning.

I buzzed the EMTs into our apartment. We answered their questions: When did the pain start? That morning. Where was it on a scale of one to 10, with 10 being worst?

“Eleven,” Rachel croaked.

As we loaded into the ambulance, here’s what we didn’t know: Rachel had an ovarian cyst, a fairly common thing. But it had grown, undetected, until it was so large that it finally weighed her ovary down, twisting the fallopian tube like you’d wring out a sponge. This is called ovarian torsion, and it creates the kind of organ-failure pain few people experience and live to tell about.

“Ovarian torsion represents a true surgical emergency,” says an article in the medical journal Case Reports in Emergency Medicine. “High clinical suspicion is important. … Ramifications include ovarian loss, intra-abdominal infection, sepsis, and even death.” The best chance of salvaging a torsed ovary is surgery within eight hours of when the pain starts.

* * *

There is nothing like witnessing a loved one in deadly agony. Your muscles swell with the blood they need to fight or run. I felt like I could bend iron, tear nylon, through the 10-minute ambulance ride and as we entered the windowless basement hallways of the hospital.

And there we stopped. The intake line was long—a row of cots stretched down the darkened hall. Someone wheeled a gurney out for Rachel. Shaking, she got herself between the sheets, lay down, and officially became a patient.

We didn’t know her ovary was dying, calling out in the starkest language the body has.

Emergency-room patients are supposed to be immediately assessed and treated according to the urgency of their condition. Most hospitals use the Emergency Severity Index, a five-level system that categorizes patients on a scale from “resuscitate” (treat immediately) to “non-urgent” (treat within two to 24 hours).

I knew which end of the spectrum we were on. Rachel was nearly crucified with pain, her arms gripping the metal rails blanched-knuckle tight. I flagged down the first nurse I could.

“My wife,” I said. “I’ve never seen her like this. Something’s wrong, you have to see her.”

“She’ll have to wait her turn,” she said. Other nurses’ reactions ranged from dismissive to condescending. “You’re just feeling a little pain, honey,” one of them told Rachel, all but patting her head.

We didn’t know her ovary was dying, calling out in the starkest language the body has. I saw only the way Rachel’s whole face twisted with the pain.

Soon, I started to realize—in a kind of panic—that there was no system of triage in effect. The other patients in the line slept peacefully, or stared up at the ceiling, bored, or chatted with their loved ones. It seemed that arrival order, not symptom severity, would determine when we’d be seen.

As we neared the ward’s open door, a nurse came to take Rachel’s blood pressure. By then, Rachel was writhing so uncontrollably that the nurse couldn’t get her reading.

She sighed and put down her squeezebox.

“You’ll have to sit still, or we’ll just have to start over,” she said.

Finally, we pulled her bed inside. They strapped a plastic bracelet, like half a handcuff, around Rachel’s wrist.

* * *

From an early age we’re taught to observe basic social codes: Be polite. Ask nicely.Wait your turn. But during an emergency, established codes evaporate—this is why ambulances can run red lights and drive on the wrong side of the road. I found myself pleading, uselessly, for that kind of special treatment. I kept having the strange impulse to take out my phone and call 911, as if that might transport us back to an urgent, responsive world where emergencies exist.

The average emergency-room patient in the U.S. waits 28 minutes before seeing a doctor. I later learned that at Brooklyn Hospital Center, where we were, the average wait was nearly three times as long, an hour and 49 minutes. Our wait would be much, much longer.

Everyone we encountered worked to assure me this was not an emergency. “Stones,” one of the nurses had pronounced. That made sense. I could believe that. I knew that kidney stones caused agony but never death. She’d be fine, I convinced myself, if I could only get her something for the pain.

By 10 a.m., Rachel’s cot had moved into the “red zone” of the E.R., a square room with maybe 30 beds pushed up against three walls. She hardly noticed when the attending physician came and visited her bed; I almost missed him, too. He never touched her body. He asked a few quick questions, and then left. His visit was so brief it didn’t register that he was the person overseeing Rachel’s care.

Around 10:45, someone came with an inverted vial and began to strap a tourniquet around Rachel’s trembling arm. We didn’t know it, but the doctor had prescribed the standard pain-management treatment for patients with kidney stones: hydromorphone for the pain, followed by a CT scan.

The pain medicine started seeping in. Rachel fell into a kind of shadow consciousness, awake but silent, her mouth frozen in an awful, anguished scowl. But for the first time that morning, she rested.

* * *

Leslie Jamison’s essay “Grand Unified Theory of Female Pain” examines ways that different forms of female suffering are minimized, mocked, coaxed into silence. In an interview included in her book The Empathy Exams, she discussed the piece, saying: “Months after I wrote that essay, one of my best friends had an experience where she was in a serious amount of pain that wasn’t taken seriously at the ER.”

She was talking about Rachel.  

“Women are likely to be treated less aggressively until they prove that they are as sick as male patients.”

“That to me felt like this deeply personal and deeply upsetting embodiment of what was at stake,” she said. “Not just on the side of the medical establishment—where female pain might be perceived as constructed or exaggerated—but on the side of the woman herself: My friend has been reckoning in a sustained way about her own fears about coming across as melodramatic.”

“Female pain might be perceived as constructed or exaggerated”: We saw this from the moment we entered the hospital, as the staff downplayed Rachel’s pain, even plain ignored it. In her essay, Jamison refers back to “The Girl Who Cried Pain,” a study identifying ways gender bias tends to play out in clinical pain management. Women are  “more likely to be treated less aggressively in their initial encounters with the health-care system until they ‘prove that they are as sick as male patients,’” the study concludes—a phenomenon referred to in the medical community as “Yentl Syndrome.”

In the hospital, a lab tech made small talk, asked me how I like living in Brooklyn, while my wife struggled to hold still enough for the CT scan to take a clear shot of her abdomen.

“Lot of patients to get to, honey,” we heard, again and again, when we begged for stronger painkillers. “Don’t cry.”

I felt certain of this: The diagnosis of kidney stones—repeated by the nurses and confirmed by the attending physician’s prescribed course of treatment—was a denial of the specifically female nature of Rachel’s pain. A more careful examiner would have seen the need for gynecological evaluation; later, doctors told us that Rachel’s swollen ovary was likely palpable through the surface of her skin. But this particular ER, like many in the United States, had no attending OB-GYN. And every nurse’s shrug seemed to say, “Women cry—what can you do?”

Nationwide, men wait an average of 49 minutes before receiving an analgesic for acute abdominal pain. Women wait an average of 65 minutes for the same thing. Rachel waited somewhere between 90 minutes and two hours.

“My friend has been reckoning in a sustained way about her own fears about coming across as melodramatic.” Rachel does struggle with this, even now. How long is it appropriate to continue to process a traumatic event through language, through repeated retellings? Friends have heard the story, and still she finds herself searching for language to tell it again, again, as if the experience is a vast terrain that can never be fully circumscribed by words. Still, in the throes of debilitating pain, she tried to bite her lip, wait her turn, be good for the doctors.

For hours, nothing happened. Around 3 o’clock, we got the CT scan and came back to the ER. Otherwise, Rachel lay there, half-asleep, suffering and silent. Later, she’d tell me that the hydromorphone didn’t really stop the pain—just numbed it slightly. Mostly, it made her feel sedated, too tired to fight.

If she had been alone, with no one to agitate for her care, there’s no telling how long she might have waited.

Eventually, the doctor—the man who’d come to Rachel’s bedside briefly, and just once—packed his briefcase and left. He’d been around the ER all day, mostly staring into a computer. We only found out later he’d been the one with the power to rescue or forget us.

When a younger woman came on duty to take his place, I flagged her down. I told her we were waiting on the results of a CT scan, and I hassled her until she agreed to see if the results had come in.

When she pulled up Rachel’s file, her eyes widened.

“What is this mess?” she said. Her pupils flicked as she scanned the page, the screen reflected in her eyes.

“Oh my god,” she murmured, as though I wasn’t standing there to hear. “He never did an exam.”

The male doctor had prescribed the standard treatment for kidney stones—Dilauded for the pain, a CT scan to confirm the presence of the stones. In all the hours Rachel spent under his care, he’d never checked back after his initial visit. He was that sure. As far as he was concerned, his job was done.

If Rachel had been alone, with no one to agitate for her care, there’s no telling how long she might have waited.

It was almost another hour before we got the CT results. But when they came, they changed everything.

“She has a large mass in her abdomen,” the female doctor said. “We don’t know what it is.”

That’s when we lost it. Not just because our minds filled then with words liketumor and cancer and malignant. Not just because Rachel had gone half crazy with the waiting and the pain. It was because we’d asked to wait our turn all through the day—longer than a standard office shift—only to find out we’d been an emergency all along.

Suddenly, the world responded with the urgency we wanted. I helped a nurse push Rachel’s cot down a long hallway, and I ran beside her in a mad dash to make the ultrasound lab before it closed. It seemed impossible, but we were told that if we didn’t catch the tech before he left, Rachel’s care would have to be delayed until morning.

“Whatever happens,” Rachel told me while the tech prepared the machine, “don’t let me stay here through the night. I won’t make it. I don’t care what they tell you—I know I won’t.”

Soon, the tech was peering inside Rachel through a gray screen. I couldn’t see what he saw, so I watched his face. His features rearranged into a disbelieving grimace.

By then, Rachel and I were grasping at straws. We thought: cancer. We thought: hysterectomy. Lying there in the dim light, Rachel almost seemed relieved.

“I can live without my uterus,” she said, with a soft, weak smile. “They can take it out, and I’ll get by.”

She’d make the tradeoff gladly, if it meant the pain would stop.

After the ultrasound, we led the gurney—slowly, this time—down the long hall to the ER, which by then was  completely crammed with beds. Trying to find a spot for Rachel’s cot was like navigating rush-hour traffic.

Then came more bad news. At 8 p.m., they had to clear the floor for rounds. Anyone who was not a nurse, or lying in a bed, had to leave the premises until visiting hours began again at 9.

When they let me back in an hour later, I found Rachel alone in a side room of the ER. So much had happened. Another doctor had told her the mass was her ovary, she said. She had something called ovarian torsion—the fallopian-tube twists, cutting off blood. There was no saving it. They’d have to take it out.

Rachel seemed confident and ready.

“He’s a good doctor,” she said. “He couldn’t believe that they left me here all day. He knows how much it hurts.”

When I met the surgery team, I saw Rachel was right. Talking with them, the words we’d used all day—excruciating, emergency, eleven—registered with real and urgent meaning. They wanted to help.

By 10:30, everything was ready. Rachel and I said goodbye outside the surgery room, 14 and a half hours from when her pain had started.

* * *

Rachel’s physical scars are healing, and she can go on the long runs she loves, but she’s still grappling with the psychic toll—what she calls “the trauma of not being seen.” She has nightmares, some nights. I wake her up when her limbs start twitching.

Sometimes we inspect the scars on her body together, looking at the way the pink, raised skin starts blending into ordinary flesh. Maybe one day, they’ll become invisible. Maybe they never will.

This made me SOOOO FUCKING ANGRY

I’m angry and sad and so bloody relieved she’s even ALIVE. I was preparing myself for him to say they faffed around all day and killed my wife. Because they don’t take women seriously. Women endure the pain of childbirth. We know what real pain is. We know when something is WRONG!

The accuracy of this is so intense and so scary… I feel like I’m a weird position, as a transman with SO many medical issues my whole life, to have been able to see it from both perspectives and here’s something I realized reading this…

IT CHANGED.

I hadn’t thought about it until I read this and instantly found myself looking at all my ER experiences (and there have been more than I’d like to admit).  

As a “woman” I spent a great deal of time in the waiting room, clutching my sides or writing in chairs.  I was told for over a year (four emergency room visits and countless primary appointments) that I had kidney stones, only to later be rushed into emergency spinal surgery to prevent paralysis for something that could have been corrected with simple physical therapy.  I was threatened with not receiving pain medication if I didn’t calm down and/or accept the (incorrect) diagnosis.  My desperation in these places was so great, and so difficult, that my depressed mind, with this as a catalyst I sometimes thought death might be preferable than going to the ER and I had to physically forced to seek help.

After growing more firm in my visual representation of a man, I’ve been to the ER three times and my primary countless.  I can tell you right now several things: the staff was nicer, more sympathetic, and actually listened to me.  I went to the worst hospital in my current area just two months ago and people said they were astonished that I had decent help… No, correction, women told me they were astonished I got helped as “fast” as I did (two-three hours in the waiting room).  Doctors at all of these ER visits talked to me about what I might have, what they thought, what I thought….

I’ve received better medical help in the three years I’ve visually stood as a man than in more than twenty-five years appearing as a woman.  

Our medical system was already shit.  It was back then.  It is now.  That is no excuse for women to be treated this way.  There is absolutely no reason a doctor should ever, ever dismiss a patients concerns.  The truth of it is that we are in our bodies, all people regardless of any visual traits, and we know when they’re acting up.  This is not okay.

And I will end this rant here to keep from diving into more details about our ludicrous medical system. 

I think you guys know I already feel strongly about this, and I’m really glad there’s an article up about this from a male perspective.

People who know me IRL know what I went through with this. The short version:

On Tuesday, April 19, 2011, I awoke at 4am to intense nausea. I vomited for about 2 hours until literally there was nothing left to come out of my system. I spent the rest of the day in bed, unable to move, until my roommate came home in the evening. I could barely croak out a call to her so I could get some water. She brought me water and a thermometer. My temperature was almost 104. She dragged, and I mean literally dragged me out of bed and to the hospital where I was put on fluids, lectured for not drinking water after throwing up that much, and told I had the flu. My Roomie and a friend took turns the next day making sure I was drinking water and taking tylenol. That evening, my fever wasn’t any lower. They took me to the hospital again with strict instructions from my mother to pester the staff until I had adequate treatment. The only reason I was listened to this time was a combination of Roomie glowering at the nurses and my complaints that my neck hurt and I couldn’t move it, forcing the doctors to test for meningitis. On Thursday around 2am, they admitted me to the ICU and put me on antibiotics because my organs were near failure. It wasn’t until Saturday when I was given a diagnosis by a gynecologist I requested because I thought I had a yeast infection. The illness that nearly killed me was toxic shock syndrome. But the people who almost killed me were the doctors and nurses who told me I was overreacting to a minor illness. TSS starts to kill you within 10 hours and is completely fatal if untreated for 72 hours. I wasn’t put on antibiotics until over 60 hours in to when they think the infection started.

P.s. the Roomie who saved my life guessed on the way to the hospital the first time that it was TSS.

This is terrifying.

It took me almost 10 years of complaining about severe knee pain before a doctor finally listened to me and asked the right questions and now I have a tentative arthritis diagnosis and may never be able to stand for longer than four consecutive hours a day. I can’t work the job I love. I have to find a job where I can sit, which is hard. I might not be able to go to a con or a theme park without a wheelchair. I might never be able to go on the long hikes I love. I will have to constantly take time out of my week to go to physical therapy and water aerobics classes and x-rays and specialist appointments in the hopes that while we can’t make it better, we can at least stop it from getting any worse.

And all I had to do was spend years harassing doctors about my pain, constantly dealing with ‘you are too young to have arthritis’ and ‘it’s just growing pains’ from everyone I talked to. If we had found this sooner I might have been able to retain some of my ability to stand for long periods of time, but no. I was too young. It wasn’t that bad.

Bullshit.

How Doctors Take Women’s Pain Less Seriously

narkaoh:

wlw-love-stories:

I was 16. I had figured out I was bi a few months prior. I already dated a few guys, none of them for longer than 5 months. I was told it was a phase.

I started dating a girl. She was also bi, but she had been out since she was 13. In the past, she had dated 2 guys and a girl. We were both told we’d leave the other for a guy, but especially me.

You had no experience with girls before her so how can you be sure you’re bi? You aren’t “really” bi. You’re going to cheat on her with a girl. Maybe she’ll cheat on you too. There’s no way you’ll last. You’re just stupid girls looking for attention. When you grow up, you’ll realize you’re straight. I heard it all.

Can I have a threesome? Why not? You’re both bi. Can I watch you two kiss? Can I watch you two have sex? You’re so sexy together. I’m going to masturbate to the thought of you two tonight. This is a sampling of some of the creepy comments we received, from both boys our age and men too old to have any business talking to us.

About 6 months into our relationship, people were shocked we were still together. At this point, I decided to embrace my masculine side. With guys, I had to present perfectly feminine for them to show any interest. When I buzzed my hair off, my girlfriend kept running her hand over it, remarking on how good it felt. When I opted for baggy flannels and jeans instead of skirts and blouses, she told me how sexy I looked. When I stopped wearing makeup, she said I looked amazing regardless.

Ew, why are you doing that? Are you trying to be (insert lesbophobic slurs here)? What if you break up with your girlfriend? No guy will ever want you. You looked so much better with your hair grown out. Aren’t you self-conscious, leaving the house without makeup? You should really shave. You’re going to let your hair grow out, right? Are you okay? Is this because you’re mentally unstable? Another sampling of the comments I got, from both men and women… including my own mother.

Fast forward 2 years. I’m going into college and we’re still dating. I love her. Sure, some guys are hot I guess, but being with her feels so amazing. Authentic. I’m still bi, and proud to be bi, but sincerely glad I’m dating such a lovely woman rather than the mediocre guys I dated in the past.

Are you lesbian now? No? Well, you’re going into college. Aren’t you going to experiment with guys? Don’t you miss guys? Surely you must have cheated on her by now. No? Then she’s obviously cheated on you. You won’t last through your freshman year of college. Maybe you’ll still end up with a guy. More comments I didn’t ask for.

Fast forward 4 years. We’re graduating college. We’re still together. I’m still presenting tomboyish, and I’m happiest this way.

Another year passes. I propose. I’m going to wear a tuxedo, she’s going to wear a dress. My mother isn’t attending. She barely talks to me anymore. But her family is, and they’re more of a family to me than mine has ever been. Our friends will be attending. It’s going to be beautiful.

No, it wasn’t a phase.

You were all wrong.

HEYYYYYYYYYOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Don’t fucking erase us. DON’T. ERASE. US.

spongebobafettywap:

rad-itzel:

sigma-enigma:

the-arachnocommunist:

paekistan:

What she says: I’m fine
What she means: Gandhi was a racist, misogynist, sexist who said that the rape of a woman was her own fault. He slept with naked underage girls to test his celibacy and degraded them to mere sex objects. He talked foul things about his own wife, said that menstruation was the manifestation of the distortion of a woman’s soul, and yet he’s praised by the world for ‘bringing peace’.

He also regularly beat his wife, he was extremely antiblack and a vocal supporter of apartheid in South Africa, and said during the Holocaust that Jews should commit mass suicide to shame the Germans instead of resisting. And this is just for starters.

For those who want sources (myself included because I’d never learned/heard of this before):

http://theconversation.com/ghana-university-row-re-ignites-debate-about-mahatma-gandhis-racism-67269

http://www.sup.org/books/title/?id=26014

http://www.bbc.com/news/world-asia-india-34265882

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2010/jan/27/mohandas-gandhi-women-india

I am glad everyone is learning what a monster he truly was.

When everyone was gushing about him, I never liked him.

My intuition has never failed me.

I’m always Anti Gandhi